[clug-talk] wiring a 1970's era split level
John Jardine
john_e_jardine at spamcop.net
Tue Oct 20 06:29:57 PDT 2009
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 07:17 -0600, Shawn wrote:
> if you are only ever using the Internet, then yes, the usual wireless
> bandwidth exceeds the typical residential Internet connection. But, if
> you ever need to transfer large files from one local computer to another
> local computer, you'll wish you had wired speeds then. I typical CD ISO
> might take an hour or more over wireless, but only a few minutes over
> wired... (don't quote me on the times, but the difference is
> substantial) And wired network transfers are still faster than the
> double hit of a USB stick even (for larger files).
>
For large files, ISO, distros etc I'd definitely use USB or portable
drives. I've transferred stuff over my internal (1Gbs) network and it
was still "too slow". That said, I only do stuff like that a couple of
times a month at most.
> Wendell mentions the "next" wireless improvement, and that *should* be
> as fast or faster than current wired connections (100Base and up). So
> the future is looking rosy in that regards. But wired isn't standing
> still either, and will always out perform wireless for the foreseeable
> future.
>
> Still, I tend to agree with Wendell - Wireless is more convenient for
> setup. I very rarely plug in my laptop anymore.... (my desktop is a
> different story though...)
>
> My thoughts...
>
> Shawn
>
> Wendell Nichols wrote:
> > I'm pretty handy and I wired my house for cat5 when I bought it. It
> > took a weekend and I cut out pieces of drywall all over the place and
> > drilled very long holes in floor plates to get the wires through. My
> > wife was thrilled but I did clean up pretty well. Now a few years on
> > everybody uses wireless here (3 university+ age children). I'm the only
> > one to use a wired connection and even then only in my office :(
> > I can't say you'll NEVER need the speed of a wired connection, but for
> > internet access the wireless connection will always be faster than the
> > internet in general. And we're probably 2 years from the next wireless
> > improvement... you decide.
> > Also there are systems which will do networking over your home's
> > electrical system too. I have no experience with them but if your
> > reasons for avoiding wireless are security related meybe that's an
> > avenue to pursue.
> > wc
> >
> > Graham Monk wrote:
> >> Well, seeing as no one else said anything, "How long is a piece of
> >> string"
> >>
> >> It really is too variable for any meaningful answer. Someone might
> >> chime in with some hourly rates of competent people, but how long it
> >> will take depends on the structure you are dealing with. If you are
> >> lucky, a readily accessible point will allow fishing of most of the
> >> runs with minimal convoluted hole boring and whatnot. If not, the time
> >> goes up accordingly. The only clue we have is it's a split level, so
> >> presumably a more complex structure, and the basement is finished.
> >> Neither of these is a good thing from the point of view of cable runs,
> >> so, not cheap.
> >>
> >> If you're not in a hurry, I could do with some extra funds, I would be
> >> willing to look at it and give you a price, I'm not a professional,
> >> but have wired Cat 5 successfully in the past.
> >>
> >> Failing that, get a couple of quotes from the Yellow Pages.
> >>
> >> graham
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Chris q <quilley at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Anyone have any idea what it would cost to wire a 1970's era split level
> >>> with cat5? The basement is completely renovated. There are 3 bedrooms up
> >>> stairs, 2 downstairs and 2 tv spots (one on the main floor, one in the
> >>> basement) I would want cable to go to.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> clug-talk mailing list
> >>> clug-talk at clug.ca
> >>> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> >>> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> >>> **Please remove these lines when replying
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> clug-talk mailing list
> >> clug-talk at clug.ca
> >> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> >> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> >> **Please remove these lines when replying
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > clug-talk mailing list
> > clug-talk at clug.ca
> > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> > **Please remove these lines when replying
>
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> clug-talk at clug.ca
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying
More information about the clug-talk
mailing list